Duncan Lewis issued a challenge against the Secretary of State for the Home Department (‘SSHD’) on behalf of multiple clients, all of whom are confirmed victims of trafficking or modern slavery, and who had been refused leave to remain by the Home Office.
The claimants argued that the SSHD was operating an unlawful policy of refusing permission to stay for victims of trafficking and slavery, on the basis that they were not currently receiving mental health therapy or that treatment was allegedly available in their country of origin. This was the case even where:
The claim concerned the SSHD’s interpretation of s.65 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 (which requires the SSHD to grant VTS leave where it is “necessary for the purpose of assisting the person in their recovery from any physical or psychological harm arising from the relevant exploitation”), the Immigration Rules and the Home Office’s own Temporary Permission to Stay for Victims of Human Trafficking and Slavery policy (the “VTS policy”).
Following our application for judicial review, the SSHD announced a general pause on VTS decisions whilst undertaking a review of their policy, in light of the concerns we raised regarding the current system for granting VTS leave. The SSHD has also agreed to reconsider the claimants’ negative VTS decisions, in addition to giving assurances regarding a large number of Duncan Lewis clients who had not yet issued proceedings.
Sophie Chadd and Angelo Monni, two of the solicitors representing the claimants, say that:
“This is a significant victory for a vulnerable and heavily-traumatised group of people, who had been failed by the previous government’s approach to deciding VTS leave. The SSHD routinely applied an absurdly high threshold, failed to engage with expert evidence, and did not properly investigate whether our clients could access treatment in their countries of origin.
This left survivors of modern slavery in limbo, with significant untreated mental health problems, at high risk of being re-trafficked, and unable to recover from the effects of their exploitation.”
The Duncan Lewis team were assisted earlier in the case by charities and anti-trafficking experts, who provided invaluable guidance on issues such as the support needs of trafficking survivors, and the effect that lack of immigration status has on their ability to recover. These included:
The claimants were represented by Ahmed Aydeed, Sophie Chadd, Angelo Monni, Natalie Hawes and Victoria Champs of the Public Law Department at Duncan Lewis Solicitors. They instructed Chris Buttler KC and Zoe McCallum of Matrix Chambers, Agata Patyna of Doughty Street Chambers, and Emma Fitzsimons of Garden Court Chambers.
Contact: AhmedA@duncanlewis.com | 020 7275 2036
Contact: SophieC@duncanlewis.com | 020 3114 1130
Angelo Monni is a Solicitor at Duncan Lewis conducting a wide range of work, including judicial reviews and human rights claims. He has worked on several high-profile cases, including the challenge to the draft Houses in Multiple Occupation (Asylum-Seeker Accommodation) (England) Regulations 2023, and preventing the imminent transfers of multiple asylum-seeker clients to the Bibby Stockholm barge.
Contact: AngeloM@duncanlewis.com |020 3114 1141
Contact: NatalieH@duncanlewis.com | 020 3114 1109
Victoria Champs, a caseworker at Duncan Lewis, is involved in a wide variety of asylum, public law and human rights cases. She is committed to assisting the most vulnerable members of society.
Contact: VictoriaC@duncanlewis.com | 020 3114 1177
Duncan Lewis’ award-winning public law team holds top tier rankings in the Legal 500 and Chambers directories and has been involved in high-profile cases such as the Rwanda challenge, Manston House, and the Brook House detention centre inquiry. Duncan Lewis was crowned Law Firm of the Year at the LexisNexis Awards 2024 and is ranked as one of the top 250 law firms in the country by the Times.