Have a question?
033 3772 0409

Wills and Probate Solicitors

Dismissing Inheritance Claims from Adult Dependants can be Costly (9 February 2023)

Date: 09/02/2023
Duncan Lewis, Wills and Probate Solicitors, Dismissing Inheritance Claims from Adult Dependants can be Costly

Whilst the courts still emphasise the importance of testamentary freedom – the right to leave your estate to whoever you choose - an increasing number of disinherited adult children bring claims against their deceased parents' estate pursuant to the Inheritance (Provision for Family & Dependants) Act 1975.

The parents’ failure to make adequate provision for them is usually the catalyst for these actions. The act aims to provide maintenance and make reasonable provision for a child who successfully establishes their case, and not for enrichment purposes.

In the recent case of Fennessy v Turner & anr [2022] WTLR 1295, Mr Fennessy, the claimant, received an award at first instance from the estate of around £195,000 under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, following a trial. The award included Mr Fennessy’s claim for provision, incorporating his income deficit and the success fee attracted by the Conditional Fee Agreement funding arrangement that he entered into with his solicitors. There was also a punitive costs claim against the defendant since Mr Fennessy had made an entirely reasonable Part 36 offer, which the defendant had failed to beat. The defendant, Mrs Turner, appealed but this was subsequently dismissed by the High Court.

Some important points were raised on the facts of the case, which are important to bear in mind when considering the merits of a claim brought by an adult dependant. The High Court said that deference to the trial judge was entirely appropriate, given they had heard all of the evidence, making them best placed to arrive at a decision in respect of the claim. Whilst the appeal judge felt the award made by Recorder Cameron was “generous”, he suggested this was not beyond a “generous ambit” and there was thus no basis for the appellate court to set it aside.

Interestingly, the appeal judge also found that promises made to an adult child by a parent do not need to be particularly clear to form the basis of a moral claim. The trial Judge found that the deceased had made promises to Mr Fennessy, which would give rise to a moral claim. However, the underlying point made by the appeal judge was that a moral basis for bringing a claim did not necessarily need to be a pre-requisite.
The key element of testamentary freedom was also explored by the appeal judge who found that testamentary freedom was “baked into” the Inheritance Act and there was “nothing to elevate testamentary wishes to greater importance” when compared to other factors which need to be taken into consideration.

The success of Mr Fennessy’s claim, the level of award and the appeal judge’s comments are a real wake up call to those seeking to defend wills based on the principles of testamentary freedom and by assertion that a lack of moral obligation defeats the claim. It highlights to practitioners the importance of assessing the merits of a claim from the outset and seeking to achieve resolution without incurring both the time and expense of proceedings. Mediation is key and the focus of the ACTAPS Code further underlines this point. Whether you are representing a claimant bringing a claim or a defendant potentially defending a claim, it is imperative to be mindful of the litigation risks of dismissing a claim on the basis of principles, which in the case of Mr Fennessy’s claim proved to be an extremely costly exercise.

About the author: Caroline Roche is a highly regarded Wills and Probate director at Duncan Lewis Solicitor, specialising in clinical negligence claims and motoring offences.

She deals with all aspects of her field, including drafting wills to include a wide range of complicated situations, advising in relation to any inheritance tax, gathering in the estate of a deceased, dealing with the tax situation in both taxable and non-taxable estates, and handling the affairs of a loved one who has died without making a will.

For advice in any wills and probate matter contact Caroline via email at Caroliner@duncanlewis.com or via telephone on 020 3114 1104.

Call us now on 033 3772 0409 or click here to send online enquiry.
Duncan Lewis is the trading name of Duncan Lewis (Solicitors) Limited. Registered Office is 143-149 Fenchurch St, London, EC3M 6BL. Company Reg. No. 3718422. VAT Reg. No. 718729013. A list of the company's Directors is displayed at the registered offices address. Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority . Offices all across London and in major cities in the UK. ©Duncan Lewis >>Legal Disclaimer, Copyright & Privacy Policy. Duncan Lewis do not accept service by email.